First of all we still have a single tower cooler featuring four long heatpipes connected to a thin fin radiator. AMD recently expanded their inclusion of their new AMD Wraith cooling solution to the FX 8350 and the. With the EVO V2 there are a few changes to make note of.
#COOLER MASTER HYPER 212 EVO REVIEW 2016 INSTALL#
Later editions like the Hyper 212 RGB Black Edition adopted “rail” system that was easier to install but was dated and not universal. Early editions required that you build a base on the motherboard to support a universal X bracket that held the cooler in place by applying pressure to the center of the heatsink. My biggest complaint with the Hyper 212 was the mounting system. Offering great performance at a budget-build price earn the Cooler Master. However, even though both operate at 2000 RPM the Hyper 212 Evos fan moves slightly more air at 83CFM versus the 77CFM of the Hyper 212+. The Hyper 212 EVO wouldn’t be found on numerous new and old builds if it weren’t a tried and true product, and our results confirm that fact. There is a difference in the supplied fans the fan with the Hyper 212+ offers more static pressure at 3.90 mmH2O versus only 2.7mmH2O with the Evo version. Of course one of the reasons for the Hyper 212 popularity was the price and for less than $30USD you could get an aftermarket CPU cooler that allowed some overclocking awhile offering better performance and extremely low noise. The value of the Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO only gets better when you see that the MSRP is 35, but is often on sale for 25. I used the Hyper 212 EVO, and although it performed. Dominic Moass DecemCooling, Featured Announcement, Reviews. The original Hyper 212 was a single tower design that I reviewed back in April 2008. Home / Component / Cooling / Cooler Master Hyper 212 LED Review. For those of you who are “new” to the PC building world the Cooler Master Hyper 212 is a classic design that has largely remained unchanged for over 10 years.
0 kommentar(er)
